Automated analysis of atrial late gadolinium enhancement imaging that correlates with endocardial voltage and clinical outcomes: A 2-center study

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation PG/10/37/28347, RG/10/11/28457, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding, and the ElectroCardioMaths Programme of the Imperial BHF Centre of Research Excellence

Ripple AT Plus - isthmus-guided vs conventional ablation in the treatment of scar-related atrial tachycardia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background Catheter ablation is routinely used to treat scar-related atrial tachycardia (s-AT). Conventional ablation often involves creating anatomical “lines” that transect myocardial tissue supporting reentry. This can be extensive, creating iatrogenic scar as a nidus for future reentry, and may account for arrhythmia recurrence. High-density mapping may identify “narrower isthmuses” requiring less ablation, with ripple mapping proven to be an effective approach in identifying. This trial explores whether ablation of narrower isthmuses in s-AT, defined using ripple mapping, results in greater freedom from arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional ablation. Methods The Ripple-AT-Plus trial (registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03915691) is a prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Two hundred s-AT patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to either “ripple mapping-guided isthmus ablation” vs conventional ablation on the CARTO3 ConfiDENSE system (Biosense Webster). The primary outcome will compare recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia. Multicentre data will be analysed over a secure web-based cloud-storage and analysis software (CARTONETTM). Conclusion This is the first trial that considers long-term patient outcomes post s-AT ablation, and whether targeting narrower isthmuses in the era of high density is optimal

Application of ripple mapping to visualize slow conduction channels within the infarct-related left ventricular scar

Background - Ripple mapping (RM) displays each electrogram at its 3-dimensional coordinate as a bar changing in length according to its voltage-time relationship with a fiduciary reference. We applied RM to left ventricular ischemic scar for evidence of slow-conducting channels that may act as ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate. Methods and Results - CARTO-3(Biosense Webster Inc, Diamond Bar, CA) maps in patient undergoing VT ablation were analyzed on an offline MatLab RM system. Scar was assessed for sequential movement of ripple bars, during sinus rhythm or pacing, which were distinct from surrounding tissue and termed RM conduction channels (RMCC). Conduction velocity was measured within RMCCs and compared with the healthy myocardium (>1.5 mV). In 21 maps, 77 RMCCs were identified. Conduction velocity in RMCCs was slower when compared with normal left ventricular myocardium (median, 54 [interquartile range, 40-86] versus 150 [interquartile range, 120-160] cm/s; P<0.001). All 7 sites meeting conventional criteria for diastolic pathways coincided with an RMCC. Seven patients had ablation colocating to all identified RMCCs with no VT recurrence during follow-up (median, 480 [interquartile range, 438-841] days). Fourteen patients had \ue2\u89\ua51 RMCC with no ablation lesions. Five had recurrence during follow-up (median, 466 [interquartile range, 395-694] days). One of the 2 patients with no RMCC locations ablated had VT recurrence at 605 days post procedure. RMCCs were sensitive (100%; negative predictive value, 100%) for VT recurrence but the specificity (43%; positive predictive value, 35.7%) may be limited by blind alleys channels. Conclusions - RM identifies slow conduction channels within ischemic scar and needs further prospective investigation to understand the role of RMCCs in determining the VT substrate

Electroanatomic characterization and ablation of scar-related isthmus sites supporting perimitral flutter

Objectives The authors reviewed 3-dimensional electroanatomic maps of perimitral flutter to identify scar-related isthmuses and determine their effectiveness as ablation sites. Background Perimitral flutter is usually treated by linear ablation between the left lower pulmonary vein and mitral annulus. Conduction block can be difficult to achieve, and recurrences are common. Methods Patients undergoing atrial tachycardia ablation using CARTO3 (Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, California) were screened from 4 centers. Patients with confirmed perimitral flutter were reviewed for the presence of scar-related isthmuses by using CARTO3 with the ConfiDense and Ripple Mapping modules. Results Confirmed perimitral flutter was identified in 28 patients (age 65.2 ± 8.1 years), of whom 26 patients had prior atrial fibrillation ablation. Scar-related isthmus ablation was performed in 12 of 28 patients. Perimitral flutter was terminated in all following correct identification of a scar-related isthmus using ripple mapping. The mean scar voltage threshold was 0.11 ± 0.05 mV. The mean width of scar-related isthmuses was 8.9 ± 3.5 mm with a conduction speed of 31.8 ± 5.5 cm/s compared to that of normal left atrium of 71.2 ± 21.5 cm/s (p < 0.0001). Empirical, anatomic ablation was performed in 16 of 28, with termination in 10 of 16 (63%; p = 0.027). Significantly less ablation was required for critical isthmus ablation compared to empirical linear lesions (11.4 ± 5.3 min vs. 26.2 ± 17.1 min; p = 0.0004). All 16 cases of anatomic ablation were reviewed with ripple mapping, and 63% had scar-related isthmus. Conclusions Perimitral flutter is usually easy to diagnose but can be difficult to ablate. Ripple mapping is highly effective at locating the critical isthmus maintaining the tachycardia and avoiding anatomic ablation lines. This approach has a higher termination rate with less radiofrequency ablation required

Real world hospital costs following stress echocardiography in the UK: a costing study from the EVAREST/BSE-NSTEP multi-centre study

Background: Stress echocardiography is widely used to detect coronary artery disease, but little evidence on downstream hospital costs in real-world practice is available. We examined how stress echocardiography accuracy and downstream hospital costs vary across NHS hospitals and identified key factors that affect costs to help inform future clinical planning and guidelines. Methods: Data on 7636 patients recruited from 31 NHS hospitals within the UK between 2014 and 2020 as part of EVAREST/BSE-NSTEP clinical study, were used. Data included all diagnostic tests, procedures, and hospital admissions for 12 months after a stress echocardiogram and were costed using the NHS national unit costs. A decision tree was built to illustrate the clinical pathway and estimate average downstream hospital costs. Multi-level regression analysis was performed to identify variation in accuracy and costs at both patient, procedural, and hospital level. Linear regression and extrapolation were used to estimate annual hospital cost-savings associated with increasing predictive accuracy at hospital and national level. Results: Stress echocardiography accuracy varied with patient, hospital and operator characteristics. Hypertension, presence of wall motion abnormalities and higher number of hospital cardiology outpatient attendances annually reduced accuracy, adjusted odds ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.93), 0.27 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.48), 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) respectively, whereas a prior myocardial infarction, angiotensin receptor blocker medication, and greater operator experience increased accuracy, adjusted odds ratio of 1.77 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.33), 1.64 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.22), and 1.06 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.09) respectively. Average downstream costs were £646 per patient (SD 1796) with significant variation across hospitals. The average downstream costs between the 31 hospitals varied from £384–1730 per patient. False positive and false negative tests were associated with average downstream costs of £1446 (SD £601) and £4192 (SD 3332) respectively, driven by increased non-elective hospital admissions, adjusted odds ratio 2.48 (95% CI 1.08 to 5.66), 21.06 (95% CI 10.41 to 42.59) respectively. We estimated that an increase in accuracy by 1 percentage point could save the NHS in the UK £3.2 million annually. Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence of downstream costs associated with stress echocardiography practice in the UK and estimates how improvements in accuracy could impact healthcare expenditure in the NHS. A real-world downstream costing approach could be adopted more widely in evaluation of imaging tests and interventions to reflect actual value for money and support realistic planning

A probabilistic patch-based label fusion model for multi-atlas segmentation with registration refinement: application to cardiac MR images

The evaluation of ventricular function is important for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. It typically involves measurement of the left ventricular (LV) mass and LV cavity volume. Manual delineation of the myocardial contours is time-consuming and dependent on the subjective experience of the expert observer. In this paper, a multi-atlas method is proposed for cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) image segmentation. The proposed method is novel in two aspects. First, it formulates a patch-based label fusion model in a Bayesian framework. Second, it improves image registration accuracy by utilizing label information, which leads to improvement of segmentation accuracy. The proposed method was evaluated on a cardiac MR image set of 28 subjects. The average Dice overlap metric of our segmentation is 0.92 for the LV cavity, 0.89 for the right ventricular cavity and 0.82 for the myocardium. The results show that the proposed method is able to provide accurate information for clinical diagnosis